The administration of the American President is witnessing Donald Trump In his second term, a prominent presence of right -wing Christian Christian figures affecting the policies of the United States in the Middle East, and may increase its difficulties and problems.
These characters -which are often associated with a current Zionism Christianity- strict visions towards Islam, Palestine, and Iran, with absolute support for Israel.
We will stand with the most prominent of these characters, which undoubtedly affect the final decision of the American president, and escalate from a speech Islamophobia Who is holding in the United States under the dominance of these conservatives.
Defense Minister Beit Higseth
after September 11 attacks 2001, join Higseth House In the military service during his university studies, then graduated in 2003 and worked for a short period of money in Bir Sterens.
But he quickly left the job despite its large returns to join the army, and he justified his decision to desire what he described as “Wahhabis”, and he began training in Georgia to be an infantry officer, then served in Guantanamo detention center In 2004, an experiment he said was boring, as his mission was limited to guarding those called “the scum of the Islamists.”
In 2005, he was transferred to Iraq with the 101st mobile division, and participated in battles in Samarra and the Sunni triangle, where he expressed his explicit rejection of the rules of engagement, and directed his soldiers to ignore them and deal directly with any possible threat without returning to the law.
Then in 2012, he served in Afghanistan as a chief trainer at the Academy of Rebellion in Kabul, continuing his activities in supporting US military operations outside the country.

As for the matter that sparked the controversy in late March, in this forest of statements and ideas, when the US Secretary of Defense appeared during his visit to the Burel Harper-Hikam air and sea base, and one of the pictures showed a tattoo on his arm bearing the word “infidel” written in Arabic during his participation in the training with the soldiers, as the word “infidel” appeared in the phrase “Deus Vult” in Latin, which means ” The god, “a slogan dating back to the Middle Ages and was using military chants during the Crusades.
Beit Higseth looks at Islam from purely evengered ideological dimensions, as well as historical, demographic and military roles, and this vision clearly expressed in his book “The American Crusader Campaign”, as he sees that “Islam is an aggressive religion.”
He never hidden his strict vision towards Islam, a vision that some see as an extension of thought.Crusades“The modern, he says in his book” in the field “that” Islam, especially Islamism, is based on closed and solid religious traditions, “as he expresses a fanatic position on all Islamic movements, and warns of its danger and the need to stand before it.

Stephen Miller, close Trump advisor
Stephen Miller grew up in a Jewish family who lived her life in the US state of California, and today he is the position of chief White House Policy Affairs and Adviser to Internal Security since January 2025, a man known for his strict right -wing vision, especially against immigration and Islam.
The driving force behind the issuance of the “ban of Muslims” law related to the prevention of the entry of citizens of 7 Muslim countries to the United States, the dismantling of asylum programs and the reduction of the numbers of admitted refugees
During his university years, Stephen Miller began to consolidate his own vision on Islam and Muslims, a vision that tends to do the ideological hostility and cultural confrontation. In that period, according to the Times of Israel newspaper, he launched a student project titled “The Project of Awareness of Terrorism”, whose stated goal was to “reveal the threat of fascist Islam”.
Throughout this project, Miller organized documentary films linking Islam as a whole to violence and aggressive expansion.
In his articles and general activities, Miller confirmed that the United States is fighting an existential war with “fascist Islam”, and that American universities have become unable to realize this threat because of what he described as the control of left -wing thought on it, which is tolerated with Islam and gave him the way.
That is why he defended The American invasion of Iraq As a legitimate response to this danger, considering that the radical Islamic forces seek to impose their divine will on other civilizations, which requires them to respond to strength and firmness.

As he entered the political field later, Miller continued to promote the same speech.
The ban was not just a political decision, but rather a direct reflection of Miller’s vision of Islam as a cultural and security threat, and press reports revealed that Miller was deliberately ignoring the opinions of security and legal experts who warned of the repercussions of the decision, preferring to rely on extremist right -wing sources to justify his directions.
Miller was also known for his prayers for electronic sites and platforms that adopt a racist letter hostile to Muslims and migrants, such as “in Deir” and “American Reynisens”, and was participating in publishing articles and content from these sources within the corridors of the White House.
He was not seen in this behavior as a breach of institutional neutrality, but rather a national duty to “protect the American identity”, and also showed strong support for tightening control of mosques and Islamic centers within the United States.
Today, Miller appears next to Trump on many public occasions, and almost stuck to him in the White House, and even shows his opinions on Trump’s tweets on his platform Truth Social.
It is striking that his proximity and the seriousness of his sensitive function in the White House has a huge and direct impact on US President Trump’s vision of Middle East issues and issues.

Mike Hackabi .. a priest with an ambassador!
On April 9, 2025, Sadiq US Senate With a narrow majority on the appointment of Mike Hakapi – the former ruler of Arkansas and the well -known evangelical missionary – ambassador of the United States to Israel.
This appointment was then considered a clear victory for the Zionist religious wing within the Trump administration because of the strong symbolism that Hakabi represents in the evangelical current supporting Israel, and its ability to link the American -Israeli alliance with deep theological and ideological dimensions, making Israel’s support not just an external policy, but a religious duty, as his repeated expression.
During the Senate listening sessions, Hakabi sought to present a relatively moderate image, declaring that his role – a ambassador – will be the representation of President Trump’s policies, not his personal stances, but his previous statements and media interviews revealed a more solid, if not hostile position towards the Palestinians.
In an interview with Bloomberg on June 10, 2025, he said frankly: “I do not think that the American goal is a Palestinian state.” He pointed to the possibility of the establishment of a Palestinian state in another “Muslim country” instead of the West Bank that it describes as the Hebrew name “Juda and Samaria”.
Hackabi’s position was not Settlement The Israeli is less clear or radical, as it is one of the most prominent American figures who defended without reservation from the settlement project, describing West Bank They are “Jewish neighborhoods and cities”, refusing to recognize them as occupied lands, and is skeptical of the legitimacy of international resolutions that condemn Israel’s expansionist policies, and clearly stood by settlers.
In terms of conflict with Iran recently, Hakapi was an advanced voice in the ranks of the falcons within the Trump administration. On more than one occasion, the president called for adopting what he described as a “divine response”, noting that Trump may “hear a voice from the sky” guide him to confrontation.
This was not just a rhetorical metaphor, but rather an expression of his deep belief that confrontation with Iran represents a prophecy in the Jewish Jewish Christian, and it is a conviction that is in line with the prevailing idea among the Zionist Christians that wars in the Middle East paved the way for Christ.
Hakapi also appeared in the media during the days of the Israeli -Iranian confrontation to be one of the most severe voices in demanding a direct American move, warning of relaxation and demanding the president to use the utmost force, including – according to some sources – the nuclear option in the message “Roardi”.
Hackabi sent Trump to a message full of explicit religious contents, saying that Trump’s current decision on the involvement of the United States in attacks on Iran or not is similar to the decision that President Harry Truman faced in 1945 when Truman threw two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people in Japan and destroying two cities.
Hakapi also says that he does not seek to persuade Trump, but rather to “encourage him”, and writes: “God has saved you in Bater, Pennsylvania, to be the most important president in a century, and perhaps at all,” adding: “A president has not passed in my life like your situation since the Treman era in 1945.”
Regarding the Gaza Strip, Hakapi adopted a conditional humanitarian initiative in an attempt to dominate the human context and turn it into a tool of political influence, as it seemed that the priority for him was not alleviating human suffering, but rather strengthening the position of Israel and the United States within the invading equation.
It is striking that the danger in Hakapi’s approach is not limited to his political positions, but extends to the ideological structure from which it starts, as he does not see in supporting Israel merely a strategic choice, but rather a religious duty rooted in biblical texts, and is based on prophecy narratives that deal with the region as a stage of theater for a final spiritual battle.
Russell Vogue
He is one of the most prominent Christian nationalists in the Trump administration, where he is currently the director of the Administration and Budget Office since February 2025, and he was previously a deputy director during 2018-2020, as Russell Vaget is characterized by defining himself as a “Christian patriotism” and seeks to introduce Christian principles at the heart of American rule and society.
In his 2017 hearing, the discussion reached his stances towards Islam, when Senator Bernie Sanders asked him whether his opinion was that “Muslims do not know God because they refused Jesus Christ” a fanatic opinion, and Fogat refused to describe this as “Islamophobia”, stressing that he only expresses his point of view as a Christian.
The Fogat’s tense relationship with Islam has also arisen through his battle against Dr. Larissia Hawkins, a professor at the Wuton College of the American state of Illinois, as it supported its chapter after its announcement that “Christians and Muslims worship the God himself”, and then Fogh described her belief in contradiction with the Christian faith, faulty of the existence of tolerance between religions, which sparked criticism that he considered to have a systematic discrimination against a systematic discrimination against a systematic discrimination against Muslims.
Experts explain the positions of Fogat as it reflects a Christian national ideology that is described as “the state under the will of the god”, as it is not satisfied with keeping Islam merely a personal belief, but rather is enhanced by its exclusion from the public sphere, even if it includes “the institutional separation between the government and religion.”
Analysts note that these are ideas that are compatible with visions.Project 2025“Aimed at reshaping the American bureaucracy in line with the conservative religious orientation that excludes Islamic currents.

Paula White .. Leader of “Office of Faith”!
Enrichment Paula White CaenOne of the most prominent TV priests in the English Evangelical world, and a caring Christian sponsor with a wide influence in the political and religious elite within the Trump administration today.
In February 2025, President Trump appointed it to head the “Office of Faith” in the White House, to be an official face controlling the bridge of the gap between the religious and political scene, where White is famous for its unlimited support for Israel, and is considered one of the main defenders of the “theology of prosperity” that recommends the need to donate and zakat in exchange for the life of prosperity and health, while accused of its opponents of being accused of being. It represents an extremist nationalist Christian current.
White opinions are not limited to the symbolic support of Israel, but rather the adoption of a vision that detracts from other religions, including Islam, according to one of the researchers – who monitored the mechanisms of the work of the “Office of Faith” in the White House led by White – the office includes another number of evangelical priests who are hostile to Islam, who see that the service of Israel with the sincerity of their religion and belief.

This is evident through the participation of White and her colleagues from other priests on multiple occasions within the White House, such as “National Supplication Day”, where they appear alongside Evangelical Christian leaders calling on the “spiritual transit to support Israel”, and link their position to hostility towards political Islam.
White also contributed to formulating official ideological contexts by framing the “Christian state” as a national identity, saying that the role of the “Office of Faith” includes providing support for Christian religious institutions, even if this comes at the expense of fighting what it considers “a bias against Jews, Christians and Islamists.”
Its relationship with Israel is evaluating the model of the “Christian -Zionist coalition”, as it linked the transfer of the American embassy to Jerusalem in 2017 with a hidden ideological support, considering that it is a “sacred religious duty” and not just a political step.
And before Trump came to the White House again a few months ago, she published an article on her own website entitled “Why We Stand with Israel”, in which she again confirmed that it was a sacred religious duty, and also revealed her role with others in urging US President Trump to accelerate this step.