8/7/2025–|Last update: 01:39 (Mecca time)
The military and strategic expert, Brigadier Elias Hanna, said that the ambush that killed and wounded in the ranks Israeli occupation army North of the Gaza Strip It indicates a qualitative security act, dependent on pre -planning and tight implementation in exceptional circumstances.
Hanna said, in an analysis of the military scene in the Gaza Strip, that the nature of the operation reflects the size of the field transformation, not only with its night timing despite the occupation possessing the capabilities of night vision, but also using resistance to simple means with high effectiveness, which confused Israeli plans despite its technological excellence.
Hanna talked about the significance of the place and time, considering that a choice Hanoun – which falls within the areas that Israel requested to make it built with a depth of 1100 meters- reflects an advanced field awareness of the resistance, especially since the operation took place in a sensitive political moment in conjunction with the Doha negotiations and the visit of the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Washington.
According to Israeli media reported, the complex ambush killed 5 soldiers and wounded 10 others, while another soldier is still missing, and said that one of the dead was a senior officer, and that the site was witnessing “massive field chaos.”
Ascending context
Brigadier Hanna added that what makes these operations is not isolated from each other is their association with an ascending context, who Jabalia to Shuja’ia And Khan Yunis, then, now Beit Hanoun, indicates that the resistance maintains a studied operational pattern that drains the enemy and reveals its weaknesses.
He pointed out that Israel, despite having advanced vehicles of the type “Gideon”, is still unable to resolve the field or establish its control, which was revealed by its failure to maintain sites inside the sector despite the repeated announcement of controlling large areas.
The “Yahlum” engineering unit of the target army is one of the most prominent arms that Israel uses to booby -off and detonate the homes of the Palestinians, and it has become a frequent target of resistance operations during the past weeks.
Hanna pointed out that the concept of “rapid decisiveness” adopted by the Israeli army – as part of its doctrine based on deterrence and early warning – has actually fell in Gaza, as the war entered its 20th month without decisive results despite all external military support.
3 scenarios
He emphasized that the Israeli political leadership has 3 possible scenarios: the first of which is the occupation of the entire sector, with the human costs and heavy losses that this holds, and the second is partial control with attrition, and the third is a return to negotiating a comprehensive deal that removes the army from the impasse without defeat.
In one of the most complex operations since the beginning of the war, Israeli media reported that the ambush in Beit Hanoun used a sequence of explosive devices began to target armored and then ammunition robot, followed by strikes of the rescue forces with selected packages and gunfire at the remainder of them.
Hanna said that the resistance tactic has become based on an organized individual fighting that depends on simplicity in the face of complexity, and shows an advanced awareness of the field terrain. He added that whoever monitors the performance of the resistance realizes that it is fighting with engineering plans that redraw the devastating reality in a way that serves the processes.
He continued that the Israeli engineering teams, despite the frequent targeting and the fall of dozens of deaths in their ranks, are still in the same ambushes, which reveals a clear failure in adapting to the field that is constantly changing in the Gaza Strip.
Efficiency and readiness
Regarding the significance of targeting the “Juda Judea” battalion of Major General Kfir, a battalion that includes soldiers from the Haredim, Hanna said that the involvement of strict religious units in the fighting does not change the reality, because the battlefield does not deal with ideology but with efficiency and readiness.
He explained that the new strategy of the occupation leaders has become based on entry and survival after the incursion, and not just entry, destruction and withdrawal, but the failure to implement this approach returned the army to the zero point, as the field progress corresponds to continuous bleeding.
It is noteworthy that last month witnessed the killing of more than 20 Israeli soldiers and officers, which is the highest since the beginning of the war, according to Israeli statistics, during which qualitative operations were carried out against the “Iguz” unit and another in Khan Yunis It killed and wounded many soldiers.
Hanna considered that the resistance succeeded in developing the tactical inquiry tools, whether through daily monitoring or through controlling the field environment, in exchange for the inability of the Israeli army to adapt to a reality that changes daily.