Do the currents of the Sudanese Umma Party agree after the Prime Minister’s meeting? | policy

Khartoum- In a surprising step, the Sudanese Prime Minister received Kamel Idris A delegation from Umma Party The opposition national headed by the head of the organization in charge of Mohamed Abdullah Al -Doma, as Idris stressed the importance of consultation and the exchange of advice with political forces, in order to achieve political, societal and living stability.

But this meeting comes at a time when the party has been witnessing an organizational crisis since a solution Democratic Civil Forces Alliance “progress” Last February, after his former assigned president, Fadel Barma Nasser, supported Rapid support forces To form a parallel government, and participated with a group of party leaders after that in the conference that established the founding of the “Faculty of Sudan”, which later chose the Leader of Rapid Support Mohammed Hamdan Daglo His president.

Last February, the Presidency Foundation -a collective body that originated after the death of the party leader Al -Sadiq al -Mahdi To temporarily manage his affairs- withdrawing the assignment of Fadlallah Barma Nasser from the position of the designated president, and the appointment of Muhammad Abdullah Al-Doma instead of him, but the current in support of Nasser rejected the decision, considering that the Foundation is a consultative body that does not have executive powers, and that the only party authorized to isolate the president is the General Conference.

There is also another current in the Umma Party, as the Secretary -General of the confident Party in the Democratic Civil Alliance of the Revolutionary Forces “Samoud” headed by Abdullah Hamdouk participates, and the party’s leader, Sadiq al -Sadiq al -Mahdi, the position of Secretary -General of the Alliance.

Observers believe that these developments will exacerbate the differences within the party, which has been in turmoil since the departure of its sincere leader in November 2020.

The solution is compatible

For his part, the Umma Party said in a statement that the meeting with the Prime Minister participated in it, its deputies, its assistants and the heads of the party in the states, and a number of leaders of women, youth and professionals, and discussed the developments of the political and humanitarian situation and discussed ways to get out of the current crisis.

The statement emphasized that the Umma Party supports the national state institutions and considers preserving its entity and unity is a top priority, and stressed the need to stop the war and end the suffering of citizens through a comprehensive political solution, and he saw that the director is from the crisis with a comprehensive national project.

The Sudan News Agency reported that Idris welcomed the National Party’s initiative to unify the national ranks, and he fled with the party delegation how to achieve stability during the transitional period, and said that the future of the country is built through consensus, justice and partnership among all the people of the country.

Prime Minister Kamel Idris receives the leaders of the National Umma Party, headed
Idris stressed during the meeting the importance of consultation and the exchange of advice with political forces (agencies)

A soft coup

On the other hand, the head of the political bureau of the National Umma Party, Muhammad al -Mahdi Hassan, criticized the leadership institution led by the Dumat, and described in a statement, “What happened in Port Sudan was that it represented a soft coup against the legitimate institutions of the party, and an attempt to impersonate the leadership,” warning of the establishment of an alternative center outside the institutional frameworks of the party.

He added that “everyone who participates or ran this division movement will expose themselves to organizational accountability, and an urgent internal investigation will be opened according to the party’s regulations.”

In another development, Burma Nasser headed today, Wednesday, a meeting of the Coordination Council in the Umma Party, and in a statement approved the illegitimacy of the party leaders held in Port Sudan, and considered it a departure from the party’s principles, values ​​and heritage, and said that the meeting’s outputs do not represent the party’s position or its constitutional institutions.

The council condemned the approach that the government takes, and said that it repeated the practices of the former “rescue” system of domination, corruption and fragmentation of political forces, consisting of civilian facades to enable a coup authority that lacks legitimacy.

In an escalatory step, the support group announced, at the conclusion of a meeting in Port Sudan, its full support for the decision of the Presidency Foundation issued on February 24, which ended the assignment of Fadlallah Barma Nasser, and appointed the Dumat as the party assigned to the party.

The meeting, according to leaders who spoke to Al -Jazeera Net, expressed their support for the directions of the Presidency Foundation, including its pro -appointment to appoint Kamel Idris as Prime Minister, confirming their rejection of any guardianship of his executive decisions.

They also criticized the statement of the head of the political bureau and said that it represents Nasser’s position and group, and that the office has not met for a long time and no one has delegated to talk on his behalf.

Regional polarization

The researcher and political analyst Mohamed Aladdin believes that there is polarization and disputes in the Umma Party since the death of Sadiq al -Mahdi about 5 years ago, and according to the party’s internal system, the costly president should not last more than a year, until a conference was held to elect a new president of the party, and this did not happen.

The researcher explains to Al -Jazeera Net that the party’s presidents in the states criticized before the war, the Secretary -General, accused him of kidnapping the party, and several currents emerged in the party that its institutions could not resolve, and this exacerbated the situation and strengthened conflicts, and also led one of the currents of the party to withdraw the party from the “progress” coalition as its largest faction, and accused the coalition of marginalizing it.

According to the spokesman, the current conflict in the party has regional and ethnic dimensions, as Burma Nasser and the leaders that support him of social components are descended from a large segment of its sons in the ranks of the Rapid Support Forces, while the domain was governor of West State Darfur Which accused the forces of committing a collective genocide against an influential tribal entity there affiliated with it.

The researcher suggested that the party is divided – at the case of its institutions meeting – in light of the current situation, expecting the continuation of internal conflicts until the war stops and the political scene changed.

As for political science professor Khaled Ismail, he believes that the absence of Sadiq al -Mahdi after more than 40 years of his leadership of the party, and the absence of leadership with his qualifications, experiences and symbolism led to a tremor of the Umma Party, and he became in a state of liquidity, and what he is currently witnessing is due to the weak leadership and the multiplicity of influence centers.

Ismail believes in an interview with Al -Jazeera Net that the solution to the party’s crisis lies in holding a general conference to elect a new leadership, and to consider it from social and regional components, and the distribution of leadership positions in accurately, according to the party’s inherited traditions since its inception.

Leave a Comment