20/7/2025–|Last update: 11:28 (Mecca time)
The newspaper “Israel Hume” said that the Syrian President Ahmed Al -Shara He took a series of positive steps towards Israel during the eight months in which he ruled, but Israel’s response was a wrong diplomacy, excessive use of strength, and now forcing him to threaten it with war.
The newspaper pointed out – in a report by Ariel Kahna – that the Israelis use the term “jihadist” automatically to refer to Sharia (formerly Abu Muhammad Al -Jolani), even though this name does not reflect the truth of the man, and that the reality defies the simple stereotypes.
Kahna, the chief diplomatic correspondent of the newspaper and its correspondent at the White House, mentioned that the Egyptian residing in Türkiye, Darren Khalifa -who had an interview with Al -Jolani, when he was still the leader ofThe Headquarters for the Liberation of Al -Sham The rebel- She said that his life’s path is completely different from his surroundings because he focuses on the liberation of Syria, and he is involved in a fierce struggle with leaders ISISThey even tried to assassinate him.
Syrian patriotic
The Egyptian journalist described the Sharia as “a Syrian national based on its history and statements”, and indeed its point of view – according to Kahna – was confirmed because the Sharia took a wide range of measures indicating its commitment to the reconstruction of Syria and the strengthening of peace with Israel, and avoiding any military or rhetorical threats to Israel, and initiated the naturalization of thousands of “Palestinian refugees”, challenging the literature of the “right of return.”
Sharia also prevented Iranian arms shipments through its borders, and remained silent about the Israeli army seizing the top of Jabal Al -Sheikh and other sovereign lands, and was involved in talks aimed at normalizing relations with Tel Aviv, and secret negotiations took place behind the scenes, so that the Israeli Prime Minister was even Benjamin Netanyahu And his team talked about Syria as a possible peace partner before Saudi Arabia.
Ariel Kahna reminded that Syria needs economic support in the field of energy, technology and agriculture, and Israel can help in this, which “links Syria to us through common interests that prevent any future runner, as is dynamic with Jordan and Egypt.”
The writer added that most of the countries want to overlook the Sharia past in exchange for its proper behavior in the future, noting that “it is unlikely that the world will stop just because of Israel’s objection,” especially since the American President Donald Trump The most supportive of Israel met Sharia and lifted sanctions on Syria, and Tel Aviv did not wait.
Israel’s wrong initiative
Israel ignored the constant and clear Sharia approach, and its policy towards it was volatile, and it described it for months as a “terrorist wearing a suit”, then she changed its position on him recently and treated him as a possible peace partner, but she returned, with events As -SuwaydaTo describe him as “the terrorist”, which means – according to the writer – that she did not understand who he was.
The writer warned that Israel does not stop making mistakes in Syria, because the Israeli army and diplomatic officials did not realize the limits of power, and that the promise to protect the Druze cannot be fulfilled, especially since Salah Tarif, the former minister and the Druze leader, said that they have never asked Israel to protect their Syrian brothers, but rather an Israeli idea.
Syria needs economic support that links it to us through common interests that prevent any future runner, as is the dynamic with Jordan and Egypt
The writer concluded that the best approach to the Druze of Syria is to allow them to negotiate with the Sharia, and that Israel did not inspire anything from sedition.
Kahna concluded that Israel is undermining its security and diplomatic interests, because the Sharia from his office until last night, has been extending the hand of peace and Israel has been rejecting it, but it is not too late, and on Tel Aviv reorganizing its ranks and reseting its policy, and to tell the Sharia that it will not tolerate a massacre of the Druze, but it must also say to the Druze that they have to coexist with the Damascus regime, and that it cannot guarantee their safety.