In the twentieth century, especially during the peak of the Cold War, the shelters were built at the expense of the states and managed within the civil protection programs, as part of the strategy of the comprehensive preparation for any nuclear attack. These shelters were not a luxury, but rather a general national infrastructure, constructed under schools, government buildings, and even in residential neighborhoods, and are open to all without class or financial discrimination.
The shelters at the time were simple design: gray boxes buried underground, in which dry materials, gas masks, and manual electricity generators are accumulated. But it carried a clear symbol of the idea of collective survival, where the citizen is part of the state -led protection system.
Today, the scene has changed completely. The shelters are no longer a way to protect the population, but rather turned into special investment projects, which mimic luxury and target the wealthy. It is no longer managed by state agencies, but rather from private companies that are marketed for luxury and luxurious survival solutions.
In this new philosophy, survival has become a complex engineering system that runs AlgorithmsIt depends on smart medicine techniques, sustainable energy, and biometric control. Big companies not only sell “shelters”, but self -closed facilities, which can embrace a full human life, without the need for any connection to the outside world, for several years.
“Where will I build my last ace?” The rich question at the end of the world
In 2017, the media thinker Douglas Rashkov was invited to deliver a speech in a group of major investors in Silicon Valley About the future of technology.
But he was surprised that the conversation did not know about his thoughts, but rather about the fears of those who called it: Which is better to build shelters? New Zealand or Alaska? How can they control the protection teams after the value of the money collapsed? Is it necessary to rely on artificial intelligence to manage crises within the shelter if contacts are interrupted in the outside world?
The questions were real, and the fear is real. For these shelters are no longer an alternative plan, but rather a proactive investment in a world that is designed from underground.
advertisement
Peter Thil, a prominent investor in Facebook AndPaypalThe model may be the most famous among these. He obtained New Zealand’s nationality specifically to build a safe haven in a distant land, with political stability, and a neutral geographical location.
Others followed him to the South Island Mountains, where hidden shelters were built between nature, which cannot be distinguished from high -end villas, but equipped with nuclear resistance systems, independent generators, and underground underground entrances.
In the United States, Safe leads the scene in building automated shelters, inaugurating the Aerie project, a luxurious complex of more than $ 300 million, with 625 units, one cost of each of $ 20 million.
The project contains artificial intelligence -backed medical clinics, biological security systems, swimming pools, hospital centers, and even the Formula 1 track in some special copies.
As for the company RISing S Co, it provides designed solutions, which ranged from built -in shelters in personal homes for celebrities such as Kim Kardashian and Tom Cruise, and a separate underground, equipped with eye fingerprint techniques, explosion resistance doors, and life support systems that can continue for a decade.
Some of these facilities, such as The Oppidum in the Czech Republic, were originally built in the Cold War era, but it was re -developed to become the largest private shelter in the world, with an area of 7,000 square meters, containing cinema, library, gyms, and conference halls, with fully automated security systems.
In each case, the message is repeated: the wealthy do not wait for the end of the world, but they desigate the conditions of their survivors, using the most recent artificial intelligence, not a means of reform, but rather a tool for escaping.
Inside the shelters: artificial intelligence in the service of survival
Modern shelters are not only working as protection spaces, but as self -operating platforms, they depend on a fully automated structure designed to ensure “internal sustainability” in cases of complete interruption from the outside world. The heart of this system is artificial intelligence.
At the Saif Iere, health care is managed through smart diagnostic units equipped with automatic learning models capable of analyzing the vital indicators of the population and predicting health problems based on sleep patterns, nutrition, and movement.
According to an article in Forbes Journal, the inside Airi clinics works using the SCIF-Compliant units, which is an abbreviation of (A Sensitive Compartment Information Facility), which is a strongly secure facility designed to process, store and discuss intelligence information classified within the category of “Sensitive Divide Information” (SCI).
Governments, military and intelligence agencies and defense companies use these facilities, and are subject to strict security standards that protect biological data with security -classified software, and are occupied with artificial intelligence facades that provide immediate treatment recommendations without human intervention.
Energy and the environment also fully automated: These shelters depend on hybrid networks of solar energy and diesel, and artificial intelligence manages the distribution of electrical load as needed, monitors consumption, controls ventilation and refining water according to immediate variables.
advertisement
In Vivos shelters, air quality sequence systems have been installed and early warnings are released in the event of a chemical leakage or an increase in carbon dioxide concentration, while automatically operating multi -stage air filters, similar to those used in military submarines.
On the level of mental health, facilities such as Europa One and the Oppidum have been adopted on natural light simulation using LED lighting systems programmed to repeat the sun’s cycle. These systems connect to software that tracks the biological rhythm of residents, which reduces the effects of time isolation (Chronodisruption) that may affect residents of prolonged underground periods.
On the security side, each room is associated with vital standards entry systems: eye fingerprint, sound recognition, and face signature. This data is processed in local artificial intelligence units without cloud contact, in order to increase cyber protection.
Computer vision systems are also used to monitor any unusual activity within shelters, which are the same techniques used in field protection for nuclear centers.
Some of the most advanced shelters, such as Casa Modena in Miami, are combined with natural resistance and electromagnetic resistance techniques, where construction is painted with infiman for electromagnetic waves, and the structure of the house is combined with an electric insulation system that protects sensitive devices from electromagnetic pulses (EMP), and these cases are monitored through accurate sensors networks It is managed by an artificial intelligence unit that occupies protection protocols as soon as any defect occurs.
In this automated environment, artificial intelligence becomes not only a tool for survival, but a “operating system” for a miniature and isolated life … a life that is managed without human beings, and works to keep a group of people inside.
Smart Defense Engineering – How do these forts build?
In the world of defensive design, nothing is built in vain. Every angle and every wall in modern shelters is caused by complex engineering accounts aimed at resisting the worst imaginative: nuclear explosions, electromagnetic impulses, biological attacks, and even comprehensive cyber collapse. It is an engineering not only that protects construction, but also protects an entire lifestyle.
These forts begin with the defense design, which is an architectural technique that depends on reducing open surfaces, and directing the forces resulting from the explosions towards the Earth.
Most of these shelters are built at a depth of at least 10 meters, using reinforced concrete in high proportions of steel and carbon, with additional layers of lead and compressed dirt for radiation insulation. Some facilities, such as the Obedm in the Czech Republic, use explosive resistant doors, weighing more than 2 tons, and closed in 60 seconds through hydraulic air systems.
To protect electronic systems within shelters, wires and devices are enveloped in EMP Shielded Rooms using substances that absorb or reflect electromagnetic impulses caused by a nuclear explosion at high altitudes. This type of immunization has become an essential part of Safe, as the rooms are combined with an internal optical fiber network that is not connected to the general Internet, to avoid breach or espionage via satellite.
As for the security structure, it is based on the principle of class protection architecture: an external wall with a sensor, thermal cameras, movement identification systems, followed by dual iron gates, and Pi -Teriterous points at each entrance. This system is managed through a smart central system, capable of immediate insulation of any internal sector in the event of a security breach, similar to the designs of the fortified military hideouts.
Even communications systems within these forts are based on independent networks that depend on short radio waves (HF/VHF/UHF), and link smart facades that allow the residents of the shelter to communicate between them or with specific external points, within the encrypted protocols similar to those used in private teams or strategic leadership rooms.
advertisement
What is built today under the ground does not resemble the shelters that humans have previously known. They are integrated defense units, which combine complex architecture, military engineering, and digital protection systems. As if the outside world no longer deserves protection, so all the tools of survival were held behind smart gates that only open with the eye … or for those who have the price of transit.
Can artificial intelligence protect us from our employees?
Despite what modern shelters provide from high -tech protection and equipment, one of the central questions that occupy investors in this field is not related to external threats, but rather internal stability: Can artificial intelligence replace the human system in the event of the collapse of the state?
In meetings of technical thinkers such as Douglas Rashkov, the Silicon Valley wealthy asked accurate questions about “loyalty” and “control” if the money is lost. The most prominent of these questions was: “How can the compliance of protection teams or employees comply if the economic structure collapsed?” Or more clearly, “Why will I protect me with guards, if there is no benefit from the dollar that I pay them?”
In this context, artificial intelligence is presented as a “logical” alternative to operations management: security systems that are not affected by feelings or crises, executive robots, and algorithms that make decisions based on data and not on belonging or values. However, this automated model faces real challenges:
Artificial intelligence systems operate within programmed borders, but they do not create new laws or make leadership decisions of a social nature.
In the event of a dispute or division within the refuge society, artificial intelligence cannot impose solutions that take into account human dynamics.
The loyalty of individuals is not only guaranteed by technical systems, but also requires a moral structure and a system of governance, even if it is miniature, redefining power in the absence of the state.
In short, artificial intelligence may maintain the operational system of the shelter, but it cannot constitute a complete alternative from the social or political system when it collapses. In these isolated environments, the absence of the state becomes a test of the ability of technology to fill a vacuum greater than just electricity or oxygen: the vacuum of human organization.
Humans are the real danger, not the “zombie”
In the series “Walking Dead”, the real danger was not the “zombies” creatures, but rather the neighborhoods who lost the moral deterrent after the collapse of the regime. The shelters were the instinct of survival that everyone shared, not a personal luxury. But in today’s world, we do not need the end of a imagined world to know how the rules are broken … it is sufficient to look at reality.
In the series, the enemy was not only outside, but inside the walls themselves. But the difference between us and the fictional series, that we do not wait for the regime to collapse until we start fighting on safe havens. This has already begun, when the shelters turned from a state project to a private property, and from a symbol of collective safety to a mirror of class discrimination.
Artificial intelligence today, and the automatic systems that manage the wealthy shelters, draw a more severe future: a world in which the chances of survival are managed, not by law, but with algorithms. As if whoever owns the money, he can program him to survive even before the sirens are closed.