Washington- At a time when the White House, nor the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, did not respond to Al -Jazeera Net questions regarding the cases of the Israeli army firing on crowds of Palestinians near the food distribution centers, which are run by the American “Gaza Humanitarian Foundation”, and if the president’s administration is Donald Trump She still trusts this institution, justified the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Marco RubioThe use of his country is the right to veto (Vito) Against decision UN Security Council To stop the fighting in Gaza, allowing the hostage to release, and to enter aid.
“The decision Proposal Acknowledging the catastrophic defects that have marred the previously approved method of distributing aid. “
Evidence of Israel
During the past three days, a series of deadly incidents occurred on the road to the Gaza aid distribution site managed by a controversial group supported by the United States and Israel.
The three incidents occurred on the roads approaching one of the new sites in the far southwest of Gaza, which are under the full Israeli military control. Where the facility is run by Gaza Humanitarian Foundation“.
The first incident occurred early Sunday morning when 31 Palestinians were killed by Israeli fire, and 3 other people were killed by shooting on Monday morning, according to For the International Committee of the Red Cross27 other people were killed by Israeli fire near the same site on Tuesday morning.
Israel condemned what it considered “false reports” that its forces opened fire on or near the sites. She said that some soldiers fired warning shots on Sunday one kilometer, and that they also opened fire after identifying “several suspects” on Monday and Tuesday.
An investigation of the CNN opened the Israeli army confirmed the fire of Palestinian crowds while trying to make their way to food distribution centers. The network showed a 6 -minute report that included documented scenes of shooting last Sunday morning, and dozens of victims were killed and wounded.
The investigation was martyred with more than 12 eyewitnesses who were shot in the first hours of Sunday morning. The investigation also cited what the “Gaza Humanitarian Foundation”, which runs the site, said that the Israeli forces were operating in the region during the same period.
Videos of the investigation showed the shooting near an orbit in which hundreds of Palestinians gathered about 800 meters from the military aid distribution site in Tel Al Sultan area Bafah, which is the pre -determined road along the coast on Al -Rashid Street, is an area under the control of the Israeli army, which starts from an Israeli base close to the distribution center.
After the martyrdom of 31 Palestinians when they went to an aid center run by an American company west of Rafah .. UNRWA: Distribution of aid in #Gaza He became a deadly trap pic.twitter.com/hPp0C5613y
Al -Jazeera channel (@AjArabic) June 1, 2025
Support demands
The neutral organizations accused the Foundation of aiming to bypass the United Nations, and considered the method of its work inactive and immoral.
In contrast, the US ambassador called “the United Nations and NGOs to support the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to help in handing the aid safely and without reaching Hamas.” The Foundation’s pledges have repeated the delivery of humanitarian aid in a manner consistent with the principles of humanity, neutrality, independence, and non -alignment.
In its justification to use the right of the veto to prevent the passage of a decision of the Security Council calling for a ceasefire and the introduction of aid to the people of Gaza, the US ambassador stated that the proposed decision was to acknowledge the catastrophic defects that have marred the previously approved method of distributing aid, which allowed Hamas to enrich itself at the expense of the Palestinians, and failed to deliver water and food to those who need it.
It is noteworthy that the draft resolution demanded an immediate, unconditional and permanent cease United Nations”.
A tragedy, not a massacre
The voices and research centers known for their proximity to Israel to defend the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, after the shooting of the residents of the Gaza Strip who went to obtain food.
“Hamas wants to sabotage Israel’s plans to exclude the terrorist group from one of its control and remaining influence in Gaza: the distribution of food and aid,” said writer Eli Lake at the Free Press website.
He believes that “this is an important part of the context missing from almost all the stories of the first day about the alleged massacres. This may also explain why the world woke up on Tuesday morning to more reports of shooting on the Palestinians while waiting for food shipments.”
He added, “Israel is trying to deliver food in the middle of a fighting area. Even the most professional armies make mistakes. If these shooting accounts are accurate, the Israelis fired warning shots when the crowd approached the site before the distribution of aid is ready. This is a tragedy, but it is not a massacre.”
At the same time, the Democrats for Democrats has published several reports indicating that it is in the interest of Hamas to thwart the new aid mechanism in all possible ways, including intimidation, coercion or explicit violence to remove the Palestinians from reaching aid in independent distribution sites.
She said that the Gaza Humanitarian Corporation strongly rejects reports of civilian casualties in the organization’s safe distribution sites after CNN, BBC, New York Times, Associated Press, and several other media outlets, claimed that dozens of Palestinians were killed by Israeli fire near the humanitarian aid distribution areas.
“The repeated failure of the Israeli army to respond quickly and effectively to emerging accounts creates a void often fill in hostile actors.”
He added that in many cases, the delay in publishing the verified information or the visual evidence of false allegations allows the formation and forming global discourse before clarifying the facts.
“Priority must be given speed, clarity and credibility if Israel wants to face misleading as a weapon by its opponents.”