The new proposal for the ceasefire between the Islamic Resistance Movement (the Islamic Resistance Movement) was received (agitation) AndIsrael A widespread interaction on social media platforms between Palestinian tweets, amid a state of popular anticipation of the upcoming negotiations in the Qatari capital, Doha, which is the focus of attention of Palestinians and the world in light of the endeavors to end the war of extermination that has continued since October 7, 2023.
And Israeli media reported, yesterday evening, Saturday, that Israel decided to send the negotiating delegation to Doha to discuss the details of the ceasefire proposal and the exchange of prisoners, after it received the response of Hamas.
And last Friday evening, Hamas announced that it had handed over the brokers its response to the proposal after completing its internal consultations and with the Palestinian factions and forces, and described its response as “characterized by positive”, stressing “readiness with all seriousness to enter immediately in a round of negotiations on the implementation mechanism.”
Three points of disagreement will be negotiated in Doha, what is it?
Can it be resolved?There are three fundamental points, not formal
First: Ensuring that the ceasefire continues and leads to the end of the war permanently
Can it be solved? In practice, Trump will be keen to provide (personal) guarantees because Netanyahu does not accept writing a text in this regard
Do…
– Fayed abushammalah. Fayed Abu Shamala (@fayedfa) July 4, 2025
The opinions of the tweeters differed regarding the proposal, as some of them saw that the positive response of Hamas might indicate a change in the movement’s strategy, considering that such a step might reflect a shift in the approach to dealing with the ongoing war.
Hamas’s positive response to the ceasefire can indicate a change in the strategy of this group.
– Moataz (@motaz0423) July 4, 2025
Others warned that accepting and implementing the agreement may later be used as an excuse to accuse the resistance of negligence, stressing that “every truce is committed to resistance to the conditions, while the enemy is the one who violates it, and everyone must realize that Israel does not want the resistance to remain in the first place.”
While some activists considered that the scenario became clear, and they said, “This is a temporary truce to take out the hostages without stopping the genocide, then a return to war and starvation, then a new truce to remove from the remaining hostages, then require the delivery of weapons in exchange for the end of the war, and in the event that this is achieved, Gaza will turn into a situation similar to the West Bank or abandon its people completely.”
truce..
Removing hostages without stopping genocide
Return to war and starvation
Another truce
Removing the remaining hostages
Without hostage, a return to extermination with displacement
The requirement to hand over the weapon to stop the genocide
And if that happens, Gaza will become like the West Bank
Or abandon its people completelyThe scenario is clear
– Muhammad 🇵🇸 (@mzahran5) July 4, 2025
Another team saw that despite the amendments made by Hamas to the proposal of the exchange deal, Israel decided to send a delegation to negotiate to Doha in an attempt to bring the views closer, considering that this is “just a political dodge that will pass, but it will not be the last.”
In turn, singers said that some of the people of Gaza agreed to the temporary truce currently presented, stressing that “calling the decision to those who face death every moment, because the decision is not theoretical for those who live under the bombing daily.”
To the negotiating delegation
The majority of the people in Gaza – with all its hunger, blood and rubble – agrees to the temporary truce currently presented.
If there is one of the people of Gaza, he refuses – let him raise his hand now … to see it.
Call the decision to those who face death every moment – the decision is not theoretical for those who live death daily.
– Al -Hakim (@hakeam_ps) July 4, 2025
On a different side, some saw that Hamas and the Palestinian negotiator wanted to end the war today before tomorrow, but they reminded that the movement “said yes three times in two years, and every time the occupation violates the agreement.”
Some commentators emphasized that the suffering in Gaza is unbearable pain, but “the most painful is to return to the first square after each truce due to the absence of real guarantees.”
Others pointed out that the matter is very complicated, because Hamas and the occupation are both watching after the armistice and the conditions that will be created.
One of them also explained that the agreement may pass quickly, explaining that “Trump will not waste the opportunity to announce an agreement, and just the delegation’s travel means that the differences are subject to transcendence.”
He considered that these statements were “used to show strength and field pressure,” adding that “everyone planned on the basis of the passage of the agreement this week,” while Hebrew media revealed that Benjamin Netanyahu – wanted by the International Criminal Court – asked the army to prepare a plan to open the Rafah crossing no later than next Thursday, without clarifying the details of what was called the “crossing plan”.
He explained that the basic dispute relates to the withdrawal item to the pre -March second situation, suggesting that it can be overcome in a flexible form that allows progress in negotiations.
An activist concluded by noting that amid the noise of the news and the conflict of analyzes, the people’s hope in Gaza remains suspended by a thin thread between hope and fear, a deal that may open a window for life or close it to a new round of pain, stressing that “every party negotiates from its location, but the truth is that the hearts there are waiting for a moment of sincerity that gives this people an opportunity to capture their breath again.”