In practice, the Israeli -Iranian war stopped on Tuesday, June 24, 2025 after Donald Trump announced the ceasefire between the two parties, immediately after the United States launched an intense air bombardment on the most important Iranian nuclear reactors, namely: Natanz, Fordo and Isfahan, in which it caused great destruction according to the American narration, and after Iran bombed the base of the Qatari many, after a pre -notified of America and Qatar.
Away from the backgrounds and references of these military operations, especially in light of Iran denied the Nile from its enriched uranium, and in the absence of the announcement by the International Atomic Energy Agency about the existence of radiation in the reactors, which denies the destruction of uranium, which was said to have been transferred to other regions, and in light of the leakage of the news of the American bombing operations on Iran, according to the US Defense Minister, it is certain that through the Western press investigations the same, that Israel is that Israel I was secretly begged by Arab and Western parties, the need to seek to stop the war for the great destruction it caused in Tel Aviv, Haifa, Ain Al -Saba, and other Israeli areas.
But without clarifying the image of this war by proxy and determining the defeated from the victor, as long as the destruction and losses are among the two countries together, as it seems that what resulted from the military confrontation between Israel and Iran, in which the defeat of victory for both parties, but this war from a purely Israeli perspective achieved a number of military achievements, but in return it achieved political and strategic failures, and clear military failures, especially with regard to the ability Israeli defense.
The same thing may apply to the Iranian side, although the Iranian cuff is likely, despite the loss of military leaders from the first row and senior atom scholars, as it was able to face a Western alliance and not only Israel, whether by providing Israel with weapons and equipment, with intelligence information, or diplomatic pressure through the United Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency.
It was also able to strip the Israeli army and its defensive systems, as it was dismantled the most powerful armies, domination and Israeli power in the region, and this alone is a victory at the symbolic level in the support and strengthening of the Arab -Islamic narrative against Zionism and colonialism in all its contemporary forms. And it is unprecedented with the narration of the resistance.
Certainly, the military confrontation has ended in a phased, to start rounds of negotiations on the basis of the strategic weakness between Iran and Israel, Israel cannot become a dominant regional force in the Middle East, and Iran cannot be so, a balance that also includes the balance of power, or the remainder of it, in favor of American domination and governs the fate of the Middle East until a while, because it is in the interest of the United States A balance of strength and weakness between Israel and Iran; Fearing that the conflict between them will enter other phases that begin on the basis of changing strategies, given that Israel is vowing to follow up on Iran’s regional power and its political system, and that Iran declares its withdrawal from the nuclear weapons treaty and not allowing the Atomic Agency to enter Iran. And not to give up or retreat from her country’s defensive ingredients from ballistic missiles.
Within this context, it seems that the next conflict, a modern old conflict, will take narrative dimensions, as the narratives and their struggle are what will feed the relations between Iran, Israel and the West behind it. There is the narrative of resistance and resistance and the rejection of colonialism, settlement and occupation, in exchange for the narrative of the West, which claims to defend the right, justice and global peace, and spread civilization, humanity and progress. Therefore, the next victory will be determined by the narrative that will win.
And if we invoke cultural and decorative studies, it becomes clear that the victory of the narratives or not is determined by internal factors, more than external factors, so how will the fate of Western and Israeli narratives specifically be on the impact of the spread of Jewish voices, publicly criticizing and with the strong voice of the Israeli Zionist narrative, which was formed as a combined current since the catastrophe of 1948, the date of the founding of Israel, which was remarkably strengthened later, even if it was taken. International dimensions after the Flood of Al -Aqsa on October 7, 2023, especially after the great coup that the global and western awareness of what Israel had brought about two years ago, the destruction, killing and genocide of a defenseless people, which included children, elders, women and civilian men isolated, as it included stone and trees and every living object over the land of Gaza.
This trend, through some of its representatives, also considered that the treacherous Israeli war on Iran is an episode of Zionist tulle and a episode of the global Zionist series, and that the biggest loser is the Jewish people, which seemed as if the Netanyahu government became sacrificing it and the future of peace and peace in the region for personal political goals, false promises to the land of the date, and Zionist dreams that are based on genocide based on genocide. For the Palestinian people and the racist distinction applied to the formations of the ethnic Jews, and the Palestinians from the Arabs at the same time.
The Israeli -Iranian conflict in the light of history
Talking about the Israeli -Iranian war calls for the complex history between Israel and Iran, based on the premise that the relationship between the two countries was known for a period and islands throughout the history of Israel. Military tensions began with the beginning of the conflict immediately after the fall of the Shah Hallawi regime after the Islamic Revolution in 1979, especially since the Shah regime was loyal to the West, and one of its arms in the Middle East region.
Consequently, the conflict takes clear religious dimensions, although it hides a struggle over interests in a very special and rich area. It is an ideological friendship and subordination to the West, led by America under the Shah’s regime, to a hidden struggle at times, and clear to the public at other times.
And if the years between 1948 were the history of the emergence of Israel with an unfair decision of the United Nations, in exchange for the two-state solution, which has never occurred due to Israel’s contempt, with Western-American support- by international law, the latter entered into a conflict with the Arab world because of the Palestinian issue, and the settlement occupation that accompanied all forms of ethnic genocide, starvation and displacement, the Shah regime was far from this conflict, but a supporter of Israel at the expense of the Palestinian issue, as it was not. Iran has any role or existence in the Arab-Israeli conflict in the years of wars: 1956-1967-1973, however, the matter will radically differ after the year 1979.
Hence the Israeli position on Iran turned upside down. It is a transformation that started with the demonization of the Khomeini regime and the jurisdiction of the jurist; Because of his vision of advocating the Palestinian issue. Thus, a cold war arose between the two countries, as a real manifestation of the cold war between the two poles: the United States of America and the Soviet Union, which continued until the nineties of the last century, especially after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse and disintegration of the Soviet Union, especially since Iran was the Islamic revolution as a strategic ally of the Soviet Union, and later to Russia and the heir of this pole, in exchange for an impossible hostility to the United States of America and to the West in a way general.
Although Iran has never pose a direct threat to Israel or America, and it was not in its account to work on the demise of the State of Israel, as much as it was a supporter of international law and seeking to fairly the Palestinians the same amount of supporters of the issue from different countries of the world demanding respect for international law, the conflict with Israel was not a religious conflict with the Jews, as evidence of the presence of a large Jewish sect in Iran, some of which remained stable in the country Islamic, but it was a struggle against global Zionism, and against American -Israeli ambitions in the region, and here the ways between two era and two regimes in Iran were separated, in the end, it became part of the Arab -Islamic conflict against Israel.
Thus, the conflict between Iran and Israel arose in the 1980s and nineties, and its severity intensified in the new millennium on the basis of political hostility, military tensions, electronic attacks and a proxy war, which prompted Iran to work on making ideological arms as an extension of the Islamic revolution in the region, through Iranian parties in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Iraq.
Here is the origin of Iran’s strategic error in creating regional tensions with the Arab world, which is its western narrative tensions with distinction, on the one hand, and Iran’s desire to export the Islamic revolution to the Arab world on the other hand, as Iran supported Hezbollah in Lebanon, which will become the number one enemy of Israel, which considered Iran the largest ideological and strategic threat after the end of the Cold War. This prompted it to support the Kurds in Iran, or Iraq against the Iranian regime, and opposed any Iranian influence in Syria and Lebanon.
But the intensity of the conflict will intensify after Iran announced the development of its civil nuclear program, claiming its endeavor to obtain nuclear weapons around 2004, for Israel in 2010 to launch the Stoxint virus, a computer virus that destroys Iran’s centrifugal devices with American intelligence and technological support, after which, between 2025-2020, electronic attacks, and assassinations of nuclear scientists continued Iranians, and strikes of Iranian bases in Syria, Lebanon, etc., which prompted Iran to strengthen its strategic alliance with Hezbollah, the Iraqi Shiite militias, and the Houthis in Yemen.
However, the series of assassinations – which violates international law – for Iranian military leaders will take unprecedented induction grants, began with the assassination of General Qassem Soleimani and did not end with the assassination of the first row of military leaders and scholars in the June 2025 war, especially after Iran has publicly sided, to support the Palestinian issue in the Gaza war immediately after the Flood of Al -Aqsa on the seventh of October. 2023, where this war led to the breadth of the conflict.
Jewish thinkers against Zionist ambitions
Global Zionism and its Orientalist-settlement justification did not arise for the establishment of the State of Israel at the expense of Palestine, the land, the people and history, except that a global enlightenment thought was created against it, which was formed by a number of Jewish thinkers themselves, who remained struggling against Zionism, especially after the 1948 calamity and the subsequent Israeli wars and aggression against the Arab and Islamic world.
Among these thinkers is Najd Albert Einstein, who was a committed peace advocate, and often warned of the dangers of nuclear weapons, and called for fair solutions with Arab societies, and Siegmond Freud, who refused to sign a petition calling for a Jewish homeland in Palestine, considering that the region can never become a Jewish state, while it criticized, greatly, the philosopher Henna Arnde used the use of anti -Semitic feelings Kambar for the Zionist project, disjointed claim between Zionism and anti -Semitism, where there is a big difference between them.
This is also what the Jewish world philosopher and tongue, Naoum Chomsky, who has composed a lot in the Palestinian issue, was dismantled by the allegations of Israeli Zionism alongside historian Ilan Babia, while Norman Venkelstein was one of the most critical of Israeli military policies, and he did not stop calling for diplomatic and legal means, warning of the necessity of respecting international legitimacy, while Richard Falk described the previous decision. The United Nations has some Israeli policies as “crimes against humanity” and strongly criticized its military approach.
And if the Israeli philosopher will spread Leipovic, he condemned the occupation and described it as “Nazi”, and the army called for the necessity of disobeying all immoral orders regarding the genocide of the Palestinians, the philosopher and mathematics scientist Moshe Makhofer described the Zionist as a colonial project, and opposed the power of military solutions. In the same way, the reformist rabbi, one of the founders of the American Jewish Council, Jewish National Jewish, and the Zionist project, which corresponds to the depth of Aaron Samuel Tamares and many others such as Abraham Melison, Siegond Bauman … etc.
They are all voices that formed a strong current against Zionism and against the military Israel, and did not stop calling for the abandonment of Zionist and colonial dreams, publicly advocating, without equivalent, peace and peace and the disintegration of Israeli allegations, and then the Western narrative. These calls are inseparable from the moral dimension of Judaism, which this great and strong current considered a victim of Zionism and renewed imperialism, and weak allegations that receive humanity in general.
And if the ideological and moral criticism of Jewish nationalism (Hannah Arndt, Almery Berger, Shihaho Libyovic), is up to the political opposition to the military methods (Naoum Chomsky, Richard Falk, Daniel Mashov), and the policy of racial discrimination against the Palestinians and sacrificing Jews on the threshold of Zionism (Mark Elis, Yaqoub Kohen, Aka Eddar) It did not stop at the Gaza war and the rest of the wars of extermination against the Palestinian people, and against the ambitions of Zionism in Greater Israel, or the new Middle East, but rather this current continued, through its representatives and those belonging to it from the advocates of peace and the opponents of Zionism in expressing their strong opposition and condemning them with the military and extremist oath in the last Israel war against Iran.
And if Gaza has dropped all masks and falsehoods from the West and Israel, then this has caused a major coup in the visions of thinkers, intellectuals and historians who preceded Israel before and struggled for it, including the Jewish thinker and political analyst Peter Pinart, who announced his intellectual coup in exclusive statements to the American CNN, considering that his point of view changed regarding the Israeli war, after his faith in his faith in the past. Israel is “fighting” for survival.
This is because his point of view changed towards Israel, after the first day that the Palestinians spent in the occupied West Bank, explaining that the circumstances in which the Palestinians live “more brutal” than he imagines. A few weeks ago he published an anchor entitled: “To be a Jew after the destruction of Gaza: an ethical review,” declaring the moral rebellion against the Zionist narrative.
In a symposium held by the students of the American University of “Princeton”, at the end of the past year, the American Jewish thinker and historian considered anti -occupation policy, Norman Vinkekestine, that Israel is facing the crisis of existence for the first time since its inception, as it considered that it had disrupted all possible solutions, and undermined all hopes in a peaceful life with the Arab and Islamic world, considering it to suffer from a legal existential crisis.
The opinions in the article do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Al -Jazeera.