27/6/2025–|Last update: 16:10 (Mecca time)
International newspapers have focused on the consequences of the ceasefire between Israel AndIran After a 12 -day war, which included an unprecedented mutual shelling, and the implications of this on the area The Middle East.
In this context, the American Wall Street Journal considered that the war between Israel and Iran would change the Middle East, but not in the desired direction.
The region is arranged rearranged by the newspaper as dramatic, but in a direction other than in which the leaders of the region and the US administration considered less than two years ago.
The newspaper pointed out that one of the disadvantages of this transformation is that it devotes the Israeli force and undermines efforts aimed at persuading Arab countries to normalize with them.
In turn, the Washington Post said that the war between Israel and Iran encouraged the intermediaries and Israeli prisoners’ families to push towards a new deal.
She wondered whether the new momentum would be translated into an agreement with a movement agitation It depends largely on the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Who faces conflicting internal pressure to end or escalate the war in Gaza.
The American New York Times published an article by Ami Ayalon, the former Shin Bet, and Jalamad Sher, the office manager Ehud Barak (The former Israeli Prime Minister) and social activist Orni Petrochka, in which they said that the tragedy of Israel today is that its leaders see only the war targets.
According to the article, the time is now right to move from military operations to political wisdom, noting that Israel has bet on its ability to form the Middle East bypassing the Palestinian issue after Abraham’s agreements for normalization, but this illusion is dissipated in October 7, 2023.
In turn, the Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper reported that Israel’s bet on rogue groups inside Gaza, such as a militia Yasser Abu ShababB is unsuccessful.
The Israeli newspaper pointed out that this militia was unable to move outside Rafah (southern Gaza Strip) despite the support it receives from Israel, and it also faces a deep lack of confidence.
She pointed out that the accusations of stealing humanitarian aid, fear of Hamas, and the refusal of strong clans all impede the influence of this militia on the ground.
On the other hand, the French newspaper Le Monde dealt with the frequency of the Europeans in the seriousness of Israel seriously holding its actions in Gaza andWest Bank.
The newspaper pointed out that members European Union They did not agree on a possible comment on the partnership agreement with Israel, and they chose to postpone the decision until the middle of next month.
On the other hand, the British Economist magazine stated that several factors have prompted Western governments to make military force a priority and harnessing huge money for that.
The magazine attributed this to the wars of Ukraine and the Middle East and the supposed Chinese danger to Taiwan, in addition to what it described as the reckless approach of the American president Donald Trump.
This great spending would reshape the global economy due to the pressure it causes on the budgets of states, and in return, politicians seek to persuade voters in the feasibility of this spending, according to the magazine.
Source: American press + Israeli press + British press + French press