Although Grusi was always emphasizing the neutrality of the atomic agency and its technical supervisory role and its keenness to accurately, the matter was not always in the eyes of Iranian officials who considered him a partner in this war and waved the possibility of following up on it.
Grusi’s controversial comments came in the midst of a vote of the Agency’s Governors Council on the same day a decision to declare – for the first time in about 20 years – Iran did not comply with its obligations related to the prevention of nuclear spread.
And if the prophecy of Grusi regarding the missile confrontations between Israel and Iran has been achieved, then has his reference also achieved on the same occasion (dialogue with a British newspaper) that any mistake made by a senior official may cause a war that would end the world?
The answer to this question is at the Iranian party, which has long been considered the Atomic Agency as an unresolved party. The Iranian Foreign Ministry described the decision of the Agency Governors Council as “political and reveals its nature”, and indicated that “the policy of cooperation with the agency led to adverse results due to political dealings.”
In the midst of the raging war between Israel and Iran, Ghusi mobilized his diplomatic and communication skills and his knowledge of the Iranian nuclear file to play the role assigned to the agency as a “nuclear policeman”, and to prove with the strength that he was not the reason for its outbreak.