The Israeli -Iranian escalation .. from military strikes to negotiating pressure Political news

Al -Jazeera correspondent reported with strong explosions, while Iranian television announced that the “Zionist entity” targeted Natanz facility In Isfahan Governorate.

This direct military escalation came as an inevitable result of a series of accumulated developments monitored by episode (6/2025/13) of the “Panorama Al Jazeera Net” program, which dealt with how the crisis escalated, and how the positions of the actors in this complex crisis varied.

To understand the roots of this escalation, events must be followed from its inception, as it was the first spark when it was revealed Iran It has a strategic treasure from inside Israel, which is thousands of secret documents, most of which are related to Israel’s nuclear program and its external relations.

This disclosure was not just an ordinary declaration.

In the development of this path, Iranian sources reported that Tehran had spoken to a bank its goals inside Israel based on the secret information it obtained, which poses a direct and tangible threat to Israeli security.

Israeli concerns

On the other side of the equation, fears within Israel have increased from any new American -Iranian agreement, and Tel Aviv considered it a direct threat to its strategic security.

These fears prompted Israel to seriously think about the option of military escalation as a way to block any progress in the negotiating path between Washington AndTehran.

However, this Israeli trend collided with a firm American position, as the media revealed that the American president Donald Trump The Israeli Prime Minister warned Benjamin Netanyahu Related to me International Criminal Court From taking any steps that may hinder his efforts to reach a diplomatic agreement with Iran, stressing that this is not the time of escalation.

A clear position

The American position can be understood through Trump’s statements, which were clear and direct, “I do not say that an Israeli attack on Iran is imminent, but strong and potential. I do not want Israel to strike Iran as long as there is an agreement, we are very close to Iran to make concessions in the negotiations.”

In parallel with this diplomatic position, Washington has taken careful precautionary measures represented in issuing orders to voluntarily leave the families of American military personnel from some of the rules of the Middle East, as well as evacuating the non -basic employees from some of its embassies in the region.

These steps reflect an American awareness of the seriousness of the situation and the possibility of its development to a large -scale military conflict.

For its part, Iran responded to these developments by announcing its defense readiness to the maximum levels, stressing that it has prepared scenarios to face the worst possibilities.

However, the Iranian response was not limited to the defensive side, but rather to the direct threat by saying that “all the American bases are under its goal, and these rules will be targeted if it is imposed on them.”

This escalation can be understood in the Iranian discourse as a deterrent strategy aimed at raising the cost of any military action against it, and making the United States restore its accounts before allowing Israel to strike any blow.

As part of this mutual escalation, a conservative council entered International Atomic Energy Agency The crisis line is on an official decision accusing Iran of not complying with its nuclear obligations, stressing that the lack of information prevents the peace of its nuclear program.

This international decision added additional pressure on Iran, especially in light of estimates indicating that Iran’s highly enriching uranium stocks are theoretically enough to make 10 nuclear bombs.

An Iranian condemnation

In response to the international condemnation decision, Tehran condemned what it considered to be a politicization of its nuclear file, and was quick to take counter -action represented in the operation of a new uranium enrichment center and replacement of central first -generation expulsion devices with another of the sixth generation.

It is a step in practice a significant increase in Iran’s ability to produce enriched uranium at a faster pace and in larger quantities.

Iran has also threatened to create a third fertilization complex if it continues to be pressured, stressing that “there are surprises coming in this field,” and that “Iran’s response to any military threats will be painful.”

Despite this escalation, the doors of negotiation remained equivalent, as it is hosting Sultanate of Oman The sixth round of Iranian -American talks, which are seen by articulated analysts in drawing future features.

But there is skepticism of observers in the viability of diplomacy in light of America’s insistence on liquidating enrichment inside Iran and the latter’s affirmation of its right to continue for civil purposes.

In a moment when the negotiations may lead to reducing tension, the Israeli strike came to open a new chapter of escalation and make all possibilities contain.

This timing is not a coincidence, but rather reflects an Israeli strategy studied to block any progress in the negotiating path.

Analyzes indicate that these military moves may seem part of psychological warfare, but the real goal is to push Iran to make fundamental concessions during negotiations, as threats do not mean that the option of war is actually raised, but rather a paper in highly complex international negotiations.