Occupied Jerusalem- In a remarkable precedent that Israel did not pledge to previous wars, the number of Israeli analysts and researchers who launched explicit warnings increased by the danger of the collapse of the Israeli home front, amid an unprecedented mutual escalation with Iran in terms of scale and intensity.
AndThe Israeli attack on Iran At dawn last Friday, despite achieving the element of surprise due to his complete confidentiality, he came at the expense of the internal front that was left open, without preventive instructions, or even logistical or psychological preparations, at a time when the military and security leadership was busy with the accounts of the confrontation on the external front.
And every night passes, missiles are penetrated Iran Israeli defenses, leaving destruction in cities such as Haifa AndTel Aviv Great, andRishon Lision AndBat Yam And Rahoufout, until its pictures are similar to the destruction that Israel caused in Gaza Strip.
On the other hand, 5 teams take place in Israeli army Wild maneuvers in the Strip, but are far from the real battlefield that the Israelis are fighting on the home front.
Inside challenges
Days after the start of mutual strikes, it became clear that the ability of the internal front to withstand is in doubt, in light of the escalation of Iranian attacks and the widespread paralysis in the joints of life inside Israel, from airports and ports, to the economy and the movement of citizens.
The continuous Iranian bombing imposes a high price for Israeli society, and raises a fundamental question about whether Israel has enough patience and endurance to continue the escalation?
All Israeli analyzes and indicators indicate that Israel has entered a new stage, as wars are no longer fought in airspace and radar screens, but in the details of the daily life of the Israelis who lose confidence in protecting the state for them.
According to analysts’ readings, warnings of the collapse of the home front are no longer a virtual scenario, but rather a reality and a growing matter, which requires the occupation government to reconsider its priorities, and deal with it as a stand -alone front, no less important than any military front.
Israeli society faces – in the opinion of analysts – an unprecedented challenge, in the absence of political preparation and leadership, as the exhausted internal front may collapse first, in the absence of political horizon and international support, which may put Israel in a double dilemma, in which it is unable to stop Iranian nuclearOr protect its cities from daily bombing.
No support plans
In a remarkable analytical article, economic journalist Sami Berets wrote in the newspaper “The Marker” that Israel, in its endeavor to maintain confidentiality and mislead Tehran, completely ignored the internal front, which caused great confusion among the public, and caused widespread losses, material, psychological and organizational.
He pointed out that tens of thousands of Israelis found themselves stuck abroad, or unable to leave the country, and they were canceled public and private activities, and the wheel of production stopped, while government institutions have been hidden in managing the crisis.
Although Israel is accustomed to compensating for the direct damage resulting from the bombing, such as homes and infrastructure, Peretz says, “The new range of damage, such as flying, losses, and the exorbitant cost of those stranded abroad, exceeds the state’s ability to quickly deal with it, which opens the way for a wave of popular anger and possibly lawsuits.”
In the context, the Israeli writer adds, “Fears are highlighted that the following Iranian strike may affect popular morale before buildings or airports,” especially since the security authorities have not yet set a clear plan to manage travel movement, compensate for economic losses, or even address the increasing psychological impact on society.
What was seen as a successful pre -emptive strike against Iran, Pertis says, “He started turning into a dangerous internal weakness, with the increased pressure on civilian infrastructure and the continued mutual air attacks.”
He pointed out that the blurring surrounding the future of confrontation worries the Israeli public opinion, and increases the severity of congestion, amid a public feeling that the government launched a widespread war without relying on the citizens.
February at the same time
Under the title “Which one will collapse first … the Israeli home front or the Iranian nuclear program?”, “The Legal Affairs Analyst in the Calclest newspaper, lawyer Moshe Gorly, wrote a sharp article in which he criticized the Israeli government’s ignorance of the internal front in light of the escalating confrontation with Iran.
Gorly pointed out that the most dangerous question that is more urgent in the Israeli street day after day is no longer linked to deterrence strategies or air operations, but rather has become a matter of disturbing time struggle, asking, “Is the Israeli home front’s ability to endure first, or Iran succeeds in reaching the nuclear weapon threshold?”.
In light of the continuous night shelling and the fall of missiles that penetrate the air defenses, Gorley says, “Fears of the population of the population are increasing and their confidence, especially with the absence of a comprehensive plan to protect the home front or compensate the affected.”
While the Israeli Air Force achieves a technical superiority and reaches the depth of Iranian airspace, this “clear achievement”, with a description of Gorly, does not hide a more fragile reality at home, as the government faces an accelerated challenge in containing the repercussions of the war on society and the economy.
He pointed out that the reality reflects an ascending concern that Israel, despite its military power, may fight a war on two fronts, an external running through the air, and an inner that may collapse silently under the burdens of rockets, economic paralysis and lack of confidence in its political leadership.
He concluded by saying that until now, a solution to the Iranian nuclear file does not appear on the horizon without American intervention, whether through a military strike or a diplomatic agreement.
“In the absence WashingtonTel Aviv finds herself alone in escalation, and faces difficult options between deterrence and attack, and between political resolution and internal impasse. “