US President Trump made his decision to hit Iranian nuclear reactors using the American bombers.B-2 Spirit“The global superior, after a great anticipation and a great Israeli pressure- in recent days- to push President Trump to enter into the war currently between Israel and Iran.
The Israeli warplanes were unable to achieve the goals of the full elimination of the Iranian nuclear program, especially its nuclear reactor in Fordo.
Israel has found itself in a great dilemma that is afraid of overwhelming the war with Iran, pictures of Iranian missiles falling into the Israeli depth and the high material cost of confronting Iranian missiles and the depletion of the Israeli economy in this war unless its targets are achieved quickly.
Therefore, the Israeli pressure on President Trump was evident in recent days that he had to intervene in a similar blow to the conflict trips.
Netanyahu and the Republican Party hawk tried to portray the task of eliminating the Iranian nuclear program as a task that has not been disobedient as some imagine, and that the Iranian regime is very fragile and will not be able to enter into a comprehensive war against American interests in the region.
Perhaps Trump also believes that Iran’s reaction would be similar to its actions when the American forces assassinated the Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani- during the first presidential term of President Trump- when Iran attacked specific American targets in the region without entering into a comprehensive and comprehensive war against the United States.
This is not the first time for US military intervention in Iran, but one can extract several great strategic connotations for this American intervention that will have a great impact in the Middle East.
Israeli Islamic conflict
This is the first time that an Islamic state – non -Arab – entered into the Arab -Israeli conflict directly targeting the Israeli depth for the first time since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948.
Iran has now moved from the stage of supporting the anti -Israel military groups to enter directly in the conflict circuit against Israel. The Palestinian issue has now become an Islamic issue in which blood was carried out in Tehran, and other Iranian cities.
Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu wanted to exploit the Gaza war by exploiting it to control the Middle East region without any other regional competitor, and therefore since the beginning of the war in Gaza, Hezbollah was keen to target Hezbollah in Lebanon and reduce its military capabilities greatly, also benefiting from the removal of the Bashar al -Assad regime in Syria – the strategic ally of Iran – paving the way to get rid of the Iranian nuclear program.
There is no doubt that the dependence of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu on US President Trump’s victory in the US elections to achieve strategic Israeli goals that he had eaten when President Trump responded to his call to strike Iranian nuclear reactors.
US President Trump was keen to enter into direct negotiations with Iran- which lasted about five rounds- that did not produce an agreement on the Iranian nuclear file.
It should be noted here that US President Trump initially expressed in preparation for accepting the idea of Iran’s continued process of enriching uranium in lower degrees for peaceful use on specific conditions, but in the recent period he tended to the opinion of the Israeli government led by Netanyahu demanding that Iran be deprived of the right to enrich uranium completely, as a single guarantee that prevents Iran from attempts to produce nuclear weapons.
Although the Israeli government is currently adopting the policy of regime change in Iran, it is currently unlikely that the United States will adopt a policy of regime change, as happened before its war in Iraq in 2003.
Trump wants a great desire to send a clear message to Iran indicating that his weather strikes against its nuclear reactors is a process for her to have been forced after negotiations failed.
Accordingly, the Iranian regime will try to read the reality carefully to choose the method of responding to American strikes based on the diplomacy of the back doors that the United States may have already started practicing already; To deliver a clear message to Tehran stating that the United States does not want to develop the military conflict between them more.
This is evident from President Trump’s last message in which he was told to strike Iranian reactors, as it focused on the need to start the peace process now, a message trying to open a new page with Iran more than a speech to declare war on it- as former US President George W. Bush did when he started his air strikes against Iraq in March 2003.
There is no doubt that these recent American attacks will make Iran more keen now than to move forward to develop its nuclear program, and to produce nuclear weapons, whatever the costs and military confrontations cost it.
Weakness of the Israeli regime
This war between Iran and Israel revealed the latter’s urgent need for American military support against Iranian targets, and a serious security weakness in Israel, which makes it more dependent on the United States now before, and perhaps also more vulnerable to American pressure, especially when US President Trump decides to end the current war in Gaza.
Perhaps this is the first war in the history of Israel that the United States is fighting directly with it to achieve common goals. This direct American intervention in favor of Israel will have its future effects, perhaps in creating an Arab -Islamic rapprochement in the region, such as the Turkish -Syrian rapprochement, or the Turkish -Egyptian rapprochement.
Israel has made a fatal strategic mistake in expanding its war circle in the region, from Gaza to Lebanon, Yemen and Syria, and now to the Iranian depth.
Iranian missiles have revealed the fragility of Israeli security, and that the Israeli qualitative technological superiority is not alone in bringing security and peace to its people in Israel. For the first time, the Israeli citizen finds himself- in the history of the long Israeli wars in the region- threatened in his own home in Tel Aviv and Haifa, and other Israeli cities.
Signs of changing American public opinion
Although American public opinion is generally preoccupied with its local economic, social and political issues, and its general reluctance to emotion and preoccupation with external political issues, some external wars- such as wars in Vietnam and Iraq- have left clear imprints in the directions of American public opinion.
The strange thing is perhaps the recent American strikes against Iran will contribute to unifying two contradictory ideological parties for the first time in recent years towards a common goal, which is to end the American wars in relation to the high financial cost, especially after the warfare of Afghanistan and Iraq, and the impact of these two wars in increasing the general American debt and the deficit of the state budget for more than two decades.
Some of the right -wing voices, which rejects military interventions, have found purely economic reasons, as well as the left -wing liberal movement, for humanitarian reasons, themselves are involved in one goal that refuses to fight the United States of America with another devastating external war such as the Iraq or Afghanistan war.
The war in Gaza has caused a great tremor in the oldest American universities, demanding an end to the humanitarian suffering of the Palestinian people in Gaza. Undoubtedly, the American strikes against Iran will pay attention to the American public opinion of the high political and financial effects to support the State of Israel.
Perhaps the current debate in some local American media over the role of the United States in the Middle East and its standing with Israel is something that has not been used by American public opinion, which makes its future impact a worthy of attention.
Trump is currently succeeded in possessing the political and military initiative towards Iran and hitting its nuclear reactor in Fordo, but Iran still possesses many political papers and military capabilities to prolong the conflict between it and Israel, which Israel will not be able to bear.
The opinions in the article do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of Al -Jazeera.